Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Tuesday's Finalists

The three symbols that survived early analysis -- GOLD with a bull signal and COG and HLSS with bear signals -- confirmed those signals on Tuesday as they continued to trade beyond their 20-day price channels.

However, their options grids don't meet my requirements. I found open interest on GOLD to be too low, and COG and HLSS to have overly wide front-month, at-the-money bid/ask spreads.

(See "Tuesday's Prospects" for a description of the early rounds of analysis.)

I've passed on all three for those reasons and shall open no new positions based on Monday's market session.

Even had they not been rejected on options grid grounds, each has an earnings announcement coming up in February, which will provide far better opportunities for trading.

Three symbols had sufficient liquidity for volatility plays keyed to earnings. One, SD, is priced at around $2, a low level that never provides useable options grids.

The other two, MU and MON, were solid going into the final analysis and survived to the end. I've opened positions in both. (See "MU, MON: Volatility plays".)

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 6, 2015

References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. My longer-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here. My volatility trading rules can be read here.



Alerts


Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.

MU, MON: Volatility plays

Update 1/17/2015: My short options spreads on MU and MON expired out-the-money and so without value, providing maximum profit.

MU: During the 10-day lifespan of the position, shares declined by -13.3%, for a -486.7% annual rate. The options produced a 100% yield on debit, or a 3,650.0% annual rate.

MON: During the 10-day lifespan of the position, shares gained 0.3%, for a +9.0% annual rate. The options produced a 100% yield on debit, or a 3,650.0% annual rate. 

The semiconductor manufacturer Micron Technology Inc. (MU), headquartered in Boise, Idaho, publishes earnings after the closing bell on Tuesday, and the agro-tech giant Monsanto Corp. (MON), headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, and best known of late for its genetically engineered seeds, follows on Wednesday before the opening bell. [MU and MON in Wikipedia]

MU

Volatility

Implied volatility stands at 50%, in the 79th percentile of the rise from Nov. 14, 2014 to the Dec. 15, 2014 peak.

The one standard deviation range implied by options pricing, which is expected to encompass 68.2% of trades in the 10 days from now until the January options expire, provides a potential gain or loss of 7.8%, and the two standard deviation range, covering 95% of trades, a gain or loss of 16.4%.

I anticipate resistance at the the Dec. 16, 2014 low of $32.37 which gives MU room to fall unimpeded by more than 4%.

Ranges implied by options and the chart
WeekSD1 68.2%SD2 95%Chart
Upper36.4439.2135.74
Lower30.9228.1532.37
Implied volatility 1 and 2 standard deviations; chart support and resistance


The Trade

MU has been in a downtrend from $35.74 on Dec. 29, 2014 That peak was a lower high in the decline from the Dec. 8, 2014 peak $36.59, a major turning point at a level previously seen in 2002, as the price plummeted after the tech bubble burst.

Click on chart to enlarge.
MU 90 days 4-hour bars


We're at that fortunate period on the calendar when the regular monthly issue, the JAN series of options, is close enough to provide a vehicle for trading. This provides high open interest on all strike prices, giving much flexibility in construction a trade

Bear call spread, short the $36 calls and long the $37 calls 
sold for a credit and expiring Jan. 16
Probability of expiring out-of-the-money
JANStrike%
3678.1

My proposed trade provides maximum profit up to and beyond beyond upside resistance on the chart and over nearly all of the 68.2% range implied by options pricing.

The risk-reward ratio is 4:1.

MON

Volatility

Implied volatility stands at 24%, in the 76th percentile of the rise from Nov. 24, 2014 to the Dec. 16, 2014 peak.

Options pricing implies that the 10 days between now the the January options expiration will provide up to a 4% gain or loss on the 68.2% of trades falling within the one standard deviation range, and a 8.2% gain or loss for the 95% within the two standard deviation range.

Ranges implied by options and the chart
WeekSD1 68.2%SD2 95%Chart
Upper122.56127.29122.35
Lower113.08108.35116.43
Implied volatility 1 and 2 standard deviations; chart support and resistance

Upside resistance on the chart stands at a high attained Dec. 23, 2014 and last seen in July of that year. Support to the downside stands at a level reached on Dec. 2 and tested once since then, on Dec. 16, when the price broken below down to $116.20 before withdrawing. The price has approached quite near that level, drawing to within two-tenths of a percent on Monday before pulling back a bit.

The Trade

The trend on MON is less clear than on MU. For MON, the price is in decline, but a time of testing is at hand. The present decline appears to be part of a correction that has moved in three waves so far -- A, B, C -- and the present decline can be analyzed as a final wave that will plummet to the downside.

Click on chart to enlarge.
MON 90 days 4-hour bars
The degree of decline from resistance makes it impossible to provide for a profitable trade all the way up to the peak, and it leaves much of the one standard deviation range uncovered. This makes MON a somewhat riskier trade than MU, despite a better risk/reward ratio.

Bear call spread, short the $120 calls and long the $121 calls
sold for a credit and expiring Jan. 16
Probability of expiring out-of-the-money
JANStrike%
12069.5

The proposed trade provides a 3.8:1 risk/reward ratio.

Decision for My Account

I've opened position in both accounts, as described above.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 6, 2015

References

My volatility trading rules can be read here. For a discussion of the rationale behind the rules, see my essay, "Rules for very short term trades".

From time to time I use the number 68.2% in using applied volatility to calculate the expected trading range. This comes from statistics and refers to the one standard deviation boundaries, which are expected to contain 68.2% of whatever is being studied. Putting it another way, given an item (a trade or whatever), there is a 68.2% chance that it will appear within those boundaries.

Alerts


Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.

Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.

Tuesday's Prospects

On Monday, Jan. 5:

Of 1,201 stocks and exchange-traded funds in my analytical universe, 22 broke beyond their 20-day price channels, four to the upside and 18 to the downside.

Three symbols survived initial screening, one having broken out to the upside and two to the downside.

No symbols appearing on my supplemental list of innovative companies gave a bull signal.

There are two prospects for trades keyed to earnings under my Volatility Rules.

I shall do further analysis on Tuesday, Jan. 6.

The next earnings season begins Jan. 12 with the announcement by AA and runs six weeks. Under the exclusion rule that forbids me from opening new positions in stocks within 30 days of an earnings announcement, increasing numbers of symbols will be removed from my prospective trades list during initial screening.

First-round survivors: Regular rules

The lists are sorted in descending order by average yield. Regular rules means that confirmation will require trading above the 20-day price channel breakout level.


Bull
GOLD

Bear
COG
HLSS
Innovators
(bull)
(none)

First-round survivors: Special handling

The lists are sorted in descending order by average yield. Rules for a breakout immediately following an earnings announcement require that confirmation on the following trading day, Reset Day, require that the price be beyond the Reset-Day 20-day price channel. A breakout following a stock going ex-dividend must be confirmed on the fifth trading day after ex-dividend day.

Bull earns
(none)
Bear earns
(none)
Bull ex-div
(none)
Bear ex-div
(none)


Potential trades under my Volatility Rules, keyed to events

The dates are those of the events, all of them earns announcements. Events prior to the opening bell are marked "am", during the trading day "mid", and after the closing bell "pm". The lists are sorted in descending order by average volume.

Today pm
MU
Tomorrow am
MON

Methodology

The stocks in my analytical universe all have analyst coverage through the stock-ranking company Zacks Investment Research. Not all of the exchange-traded funds are so covered.

I screen the symbols for historical odds of a profitable signal in the direction of the breakout for the past 12 months.

For symbols whose odds of success are greater than 50%, I next screen for the absence of an earnings announcement within the next 30 days.

For bear signals, I also screen to ensure the ability to do a trade because of the presence of options, without yet passing judgment on whether those options are liquid enough to support a trade.

I sort by the results in descending order by the average yield on signals in the direction of the breakout in preparation for the second round of analysis after the opening bell.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 6, 2015

References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here.

Elliott wave analysis tracks patterns in price movements. The principal practitioner of Elliott wave analysis is Robert Prechter at Elliott Wave International. His book, Elliott Wave Principle, is a must-read for people interested in this form of analysis, as is his most recent publication, Visual Guide to Elliott Wave Trading. 

Several web sites summarize Elliott wave theory, among them, Investopedia, StockCharts and Wikipedia.

Alerts

Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decision decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.Tss s ss

Monday, January 5, 2015

Monday's Finalists

The lone survivor of the early rounds of analysis (see "Monday's Prospects") has also neatly sliipped past the later rounds.

The Toronto mining company Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM) meets nearly all of the requirements for a very near term volatility play: High average volume, narrow bid/ask spread, high implied volatility, All that's lacking is Weekly options in its inventory, and that's not a deal-breaker.

The chart has been in a well-defined uptrend since mid-December, although it has hit resistance established in November and paused for the day, at least early in the session.

What it comes down to is opportunity cost.

AEM publishes earnings on Feb. 11. In the normal course of things, implied volatility will continue to rise until the earnings announcement and then will drop sharply, providing a nice nudge toward profitability of any short options spreads sold for a credit and expiring in the front month,

The earnings announcement will provide the better opportunity for profit because of the way implied volatility behaves.

If earnings were three months or more away, I could make a reasonable argument for trading immediately and then again at earnings.

There is no need to tie up funds in a position this close to the announcement.

Despite AEM's attractiveness,  I shall wait. I shall open no new positions based on Friday's markets.

From a broader perspective, I start getting earnings-associated trading opportunities in abundance beginning Tuesday, Jan. 6, as the next announcement season kicks in. Far better to keep funds free for those trades rather than tying the money up in a lower probability trade.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 5, 2015

References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. My longer-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here. My volatility trading rules can be read here.



Alerts


Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

The Week Ahead: Jobs, minutes, global trade

The Labor Department drills down into the jobs and joblessness numbers as it releases the employment situation report on Friday at 8:30 a.m. New York time. The report is important politically, of course, as office holders and wannabes take credit and are given blame for something they have very little control over.

Of greater importance, the Federal Open Market Committee watches employment closely in making its money policy decisions, Fed Chair Janet Yellen's Labor Market Dashboard epitomizing the dataset.

Long story short: Good jobs numbers give the Fed more leeway to adjust interest rates in order to fend off inflation, making stocks and their derivatives marginally less attractive in the marketplace. Bad jobs numbers make interest rate adjustments less likely.

The ADP employment report, released Wednesday at 8:15 a.m. by the nation's leading payroll company, will provide a sneak preview of the government report.

The FOMC minutes from last year's Dec. 16-17 meeting will be released on Wednesday at 2 p.m. The Fed under Yellen and her predecessor, Ben Bernanke, has been so free of surprises that the minutes have less impact than they used to. Still, worth watching, just in case.

Also on Wednesday, the international trade numbers will be published at 8:30 a.m.

Leading indicators (in descending order of importance):

The interest rate spread between 10-year Treasuries and the federal funds rate, reported continually during market hours.

The M2 money supply, at 4:30 p.m. Thursday.

The average hourly workweek in manufacturing from the employment report, at 8:30 a.m. Friday.
The S&P 500 index, reported continually during market hours.

Manufacturers new orders for consumer goods and materials from the factory orders report, at 0 a.m. Tuesday.

Average weekly initial jobless claims, at 8:30 a.m. Thursday. 

Other items of interest:

Monday: Motor vehicle sales throughout the day.

Tuesday: Factory orders and the Institute of Supply Management non-manufacturing index, both at 10 a.m.

Wednesday: Petroleum inventories at 10:30 a.m.

I also keep an eye on the Baltic Dry Index, updated daily.

Treasury Debt

Bills
  • 4-week: Announcement Monday 11 a.m., auction Tuesday 11:30 a.m., settlement Thursday
  • 3-month: Auction Monday 11:30 a.m., announcement Thursday 11 a.m.,
  • 6-month: Auction Monday 11:30 a.m., announcement Thursday 11 a.m.
  • 52-week: Auction Tuesday 11:30 a.m., settlement Thursday
  • Weekly bills: Settlement Thursday
Notes
  • 3-year: Announcement Thursday 11 a.m.
  • 10-year: Announcement Thursday 11 a.m.
Bonds
  • 30-year: Announcement Thursday 11 a.m.
Fedsters

The regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents emerge from their holiday hideaways and take to the speaking circuit this week: Minneapolis Fed Pres. Narayana Kocherlakota, an FOMC member, on Thursday; FOMC alternates San Francisco Fed Pres. John Williams on Monday and Chicago Fed Pres. Charles Evans and Richmond Fed Presl Jeffrey Lacker on Friday; and a president unaffiliated this year with the money-policy committee, Boston Fed Pres. Eric Rosengren on Thursday.

Analytical universe

This week I shall be analyzing new bull and bear signals among 1,201 mid-cap and larger stocks and exchange-traded funds.

Trading calendar

By my rules for shorter-term trades, I'm trading February options and later for the short legs of vertical, diagonal and calendar spreads and covered calls, and for all legs of butterfly spreads and iron condors. I'm trading April options and later for single calls and puts as well as straddles. Shares, of course, are good at any time.

Good trading.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 4, 2015
References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. My longer-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here. My volatility trading rules can be read here.


Alerts


Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.


License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Tim Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.

Saturday, January 3, 2015

Monday's Prospects

On Friday, Jan. 2, 2015:

Of 1,201 stocks and exchange-traded funds in my analytical universe, eight broke beyond their 20-day price channels, five to the upside and three to the downside.

One symbol survived initial screening, having broken out to the upside.

No symbols appearing on my supplemental list of innovative companies gave a bull signal.

There are no prospects for trades keyed to earnings under my Volatility Rules.

I shall do further analysis on Monday, Jan. 5, 2015.

The next earnings season begins Jan. 12 with the announcement by AA and runs six weeks. Under the exclusion rule that forbids me from opening new positions in stocks within 30 days of an earnings announcement, increasing numbers of symbols will be removed from my prospective trades list during initial screening.

First-round survivors: Regular rules

The lists are sorted in descending order by average yield. Regular rules means that confirmation will require trading above the 20-day price channel breakout level.


Bull
AEM

Bear
(none)
Innovators
(bull)
(none)

First-round survivors: Special handling

The lists are sorted in descending order by average yield. Rules for a breakout immediately following an earnings announcement require that confirmation on the following trading day, Reset Day, require that the price be beyond the Reset-Day 20-day price channel. A breakout following a stock going ex-dividend must be confirmed on the fifth trading day after ex-dividend day.

Bull earns
(none)
Bear earns
(none)
Bull ex-div
(none)
Bear ex-div
(none)


Potential trades under my Volatility Rules, keyed to events

The dates are those of the events, all of them earns announcements. Events prior to the opening bell are marked "am", during the trading day "mid", and after the closing bell "pm". The lists are sorted in descending order by average volume.

Friday pm
(none)
Monday am
(none)

Methodology

The stocks in my analytical universe all have analyst coverage through the stock-ranking company Zacks Investment Research. Not all of the exchange-traded funds are so covered.

I screen the symbols for historical odds of a profitable signal in the direction of the breakout for the past 12 months.

For symbols whose odds of success are greater than 50%, I next screen for the absence of an earnings announcement within the next 30 days.

For bear signals, I also screen to ensure the ability to do a trade because of the presence of options, without yet passing judgment on whether those options are liquid enough to support a trade.

I sort by the results in descending order by the average yield on signals in the direction of the breakout in preparation for the second round of analysis after the opening bell.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 3, 2015

References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here.

Elliott wave analysis tracks patterns in price movements. The principal practitioner of Elliott wave analysis is Robert Prechter at Elliott Wave International. His book, Elliott Wave Principle, is a must-read for people interested in this form of analysis, as is his most recent publication, Visual Guide to Elliott Wave Trading. 

Several web sites summarize Elliott wave theory, among them, Investopedia, StockCharts and Wikipedia.

Alerts

Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decision decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.Tss s ss

Crude Oil and the Black Swan

A Black Swan Event in economics and the markets refers to those rare events that seemingly come out of the nowhere, toss the furniture around the room that is our world, and overturn everyone's house of cards, no matter how cunningly constructed.

A black swan may not portend The End Of The World As We Know It (TEOTWAWKI in the familiar parlance of survivalists who obsess about such things). It does, however, decidedly carry the nervous anticipation invoked by Buffalo Springfield in their 1967 single, "For What It's Worth",

There's somethin' happenin' here
What it is ain't exactly clear

Confusion reigns. Puck is King.

In an essay posted on Jan. 2, I made the case that the steep fall in crude oil prices is business as usual for this particular commodity, and in the broad sweep of history, of little significance. (See: "The crude oil 'crash'").

No one, however, has the time or energy to survey the broad vistas while being pummeled by the flood. For those of us struggling in rushing current of the energy sector, the decline certainly feels significant. Indeed, it feels like a Black Swan Event.

Sadly for those of us who so dearly love the dramatic, it only takes a glance at the chart in my earlier essay to knock down the Black Swan Hypothesis of Crude Oil Pricing. The decline from 2008 into 2009 was an event of far greater magnitude, and of far greater significance, embedded as it was in the collapse of capitalist finance and the consequent disruptions we call the Great Recession.

Two black swans in a decade may be theoretically possible, but they're scarcely credible.

That does not, however, answer the core question posed by the price decline from June 2014 into January 2015: Is it significant?

"Significant" is a slippery word. That which is significant to you is a triviality to me. What is significant today is a minor memory tomorrow.

That which has consequences is by definition significant to a greater or lesser degree. But the crash is ongoing and the future is but darkly seen. Who knows what the consequences might be?

If I know whether the event is unusual, then I can begin to understand whether it is significant, since the every day rhythms of our lives tend to be meaningless once the day is done. Knowledge of whether the event was expected is another pathway to its heart. The significant usually comes wrapped as a surprise.

The most most useful measure I've found of whether market moves are unusual or unexpected and therefore potentially of greater significance is based on the pricing model for options and the subsequent modification of the model's price through the workings of supply and demand in the marketplace.

The model sets a price, and traders bid or ask with that price as part of their fund of knowledge. The resulting trade, however, need not be at the model's price. It depend upon what it takes to close the deal, or to "get a fill" in the parlance of the game.

Options pricing implies a level of volatility -- "implied volatility" -- and therefore a trading range, which is measured using the statistical tools of standard deviation from the mean. Standard deviation expresses its boundaries as upper and lower prices that are expected to contain 68.2% of transactions, known as one standard deviation, or 95% of transactions, known as two standard deviations.

Markets charts and tables generally calculate implied volatility for a year, showing how much options pricing implies prices will move in the next 12 months.

For my own work, I adjust the time period to the actual span that has drawn my interest. In the case of the crude oil crash, the 196 days from the June peak to the January low are the period I cover.

The chart I'm using covers crude oil prices as expressed in the futures contracts for Light Sweet Crude Oil.

Futures, however, don't produce continuous series of implied volatility on associated options, because of the way the contracts market works. Stocks and exchange-traded funds produce much better implied volatility timelines. So I've used the futures chart as I did in the early essay. However, I've calculated implied volatility based on the fund USO, which tracks crude oil prices.

The two diverge a bit from time to time -- futures peaked on June 13 and the fund on June 20 -- but the correlation in price movements is close.

Click on chart to enlarge.
Light Sweet Crude Oil futures 9 months daily bars

Options at the peak were pricing in confidence that 68.2% of trades would fall between $91.956 and $121.59 between then and Jan. 2, for a potential gain or loss of 14%, and that 95% of trades would fall between $28.32 and $50.08 for a potential gain or loss of 28%.

I've marked those levels on the chart above, the 68.2% range -- one standard deviation -- in blue and the 95% range -- two standard deviations -- in orange.

By this measure, the decline in crude oil prices reached a magnitude in September when it became unusual. The price broke below the one standard deviation range. It became highly usual in November when the price broke below the two standard deviation range.

In my experience, the standard deviation ranges are accurate measures of what will transpire in the future course of prices. I expect a price to remain within the one standard deviation range, although I'm not shocked if it moves beyond it. A move beyond the two standard deviation range is, for me, rather shocking.

In the case of crude, therefore, the magnitude of the decline was unexpected.

From all of this I conclude that although not a black swan, the crude oil crash is unusual and unexpected, and therefore has a high presumption of significance.

However, there is more to the story.

Implied volatility tends to move back within the standard deviation ranges. The term for this behavior is reversion to the mean. That also has implications for the price.

The decline has taken about half a year, or 26 weeks. In playing with the concept, I use the current implied mean for that period as a target for reversion -- where volatility is likely to go after stretching beyond expectations.

The last time implied volatility was at its current average for 26 weeks was in the week ending Dec. 27. On that week the futures closed at $63.72. That thought experiment suggests that the price will pause and then recover to that level at some point.

That level is well below the $107 starting point of the decline and well below the $77 lower boundary of the two standard deviation range.

The decline, then, is likely to be persistent. It had an impact, and therefore, in the markets, had significance.
The best discussion and standard text on Black Swan Events the book The Black Swan, written by the Lebanese-Amercan scholar and risk analyst Nassim Nicholas Taleb.

I've read it twice and found it to be both fascinating the life-changing, and shall no doubt read it again. Taleb is quite tough-minded about the rarity of Black Swan Events, a term the popular media tend to apply to anything that gets the newsroom in an uproar because no one recalls seeing such a thing for the past few years. His thinking is a fine antidote to the hysteria that is perhaps the primary risk faced by traders.

I highly recommend it as must reading for anyone who has market exposure. Which is to say, anyone, since we all are exposed, either directly or indirectly.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 3, 2015
Alerts


Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.

Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.

Friday, January 2, 2015

The crude oil "crash"

Crude oil began a steep decline in mid-June that has cut the price in half, and then some.

Consumers see the move as the beginning of a new golden age of cheap energy, an anteroom to Utopia.

Companies that earn their living finding, refining and delivering the sticky stuffy, and traders with bull positions in their stocks, see the decline as a disruptive force that threatens to leave a major sector in the economy collapsed into smoking ruins, a bargain-priced Armageddon.

Adam Smith, I'm quite sure, would enjoy the narrow self interest that guides the rhetoric.

When faced with The End Of The World As We Know It, be it Utopia or Doom, I turn to the ideas of the 20th century French historian Fernand Braudel.

Braudel and others within the Annales School divided the writing of history into three levels: courte durée, also called histoire Ã©vénementielle, conjonctures, and the longue durée.

In those moments when we're not trying to impress our friends, we would call it the short span, or the history of events, the circumstances, and the long span.

The short span covers the headlines above our news stories, the punditry on our cable networks and the solemn pronunciations of our politicians, the sorts of events that the world is excited about for a day or a week or even a month before it fades into memory. The Obama administration's efforts to focus on economic recovery and jobs, and the Congressional Republicans' efforts to avoid tax increases and reduce government spending fit into this category.

The long term is the geologic time of our lives, the changes so slow that they provide the assumptions behind our existences. The rise of capitalism and liberal democracy beginning in the 18th century might be an example. The long term is largely beyond the reach of policy.

The things in between are covered by the least explicit of Braudel's terms: Circumstances, or the conjonctures. Think of it the trends of years and perhaps a few decades that define eras and yet are within the reach of policy, such as the decline of middle class incomes in the capitalist democracies since the 1970s.

Stocks, their traders and their analytical tools tend to collapse time into a relentless now. Yet market analysis is an exercise in historiography, and Braudel's levels apply just as surely to the markets as they do to the Great War of 1914-1917 and its aftermath.

This 20-year chart of light sweet crude oil futures is, in my mind, a slice of the conjonture level of analysis. With my charting software, 20 years is the longest period available. After all, I'm sure the reasoning goes, why would anyone want to go longer?

Click on chart to enlarge.
Light sweet crude oil futures, 20 years, monthly bars
Crude peaked in July 2008 at $147.22, subsequently declining to $33.32 in January 2009, recovering part of the loss with a rise to $115.83 in May 2011, pausing with a three-year triangle pattern in a sideways trend, and then crashing, as some call it, in the present decline that has carried the price down to about $53.

Prior to the peak, crude had risen from at least $10.65 on December 1998 in a decade-long journey. I say "at least" because I have only a 20-year window; I can't say with certainty when the rise to 2008 began.

One benefit of the context provided by the conjonctures view is that it becomes readily apparent that the decline so far isn't much of a decline.

In the context of the fall from the peak, the price must break below $33.20 before I'll consider it to be in a downtrend. In other words, it must set a lower low.

In the broader context that considers the 2008 peak to be a stop in the journey rather than a destination, I would require the price to fall below at least $10.65 before I would consider the decline to be significant in terms of trend.

How likely is a decline of such magnitudes? It is a classic question in trading: How low can it go?

No one knows the future, of course. For insight, but not certainty, I turn to Elliott wave analysis, whose 20th-century inventor, Robert N. Elliott, had a bit of Braudel in his heart.

Under Elliott, if the decline is a counter-trend correction from the 2008 peak, it would normally come in three waves designated by letters. My count shows crude to be in the final wave, the C-wave, of that move. It can be expected to move below the end of the A wave, $33.20, if the correction is in the form of what Elliott called a Zig-Zag, or to end at about that level if it is a Flat.

Sometimes the three-wave patterns come in groups of three, so the correction could go on for some time, but eventually it will end and the price will rise back above the the $147.27 level as the larger-scale uptrend continues.

However, our 20-year window gives a fragmentary picture. It is also possible that the decline is the beginning of a new downtrend. In that case, the dominant pattern will be five-wave movements, designated by numbers.

If the latter case applies, then the A wave on my chart is actually wave 1, the B wave is wave 2 and the present C wave is wave 3, which can be expected to break below $33.32, perhaps quite far below. There is no way under Elliott to say how low it could go in that case.

To understand the nature of the trend, I need a larger window. Happily, the public domain imagery on Wikimedia comes to the rescue.


Crude oil price history from 1861-2006, dollars per barrel
For this long a period, I'll be looking at the inflation-adjusted dollar figures, on the orange line.

The chart shows a peak in the mid-1860s at about $100, followed by a century of decline to a low below $20 in the early 1970s. Clearly, crude was in a downtrend during that period.

From the early 1970s, crude prices rose to a peak above $80 in the late 1970s, declined again to the 1998 low, which is $14 in 2008 dollars, and then began the rise to the 2008 peak of $111 in 2008 dollars.

By my Elliott wave count, the end in the late 1960s of the decline from the 1860s marks the beginning of a new uptrend, with the 1970s peak being the end of wave 1, the 1998 low being the end of wave 2 and the 2008 peak being the end of wave 3.

Given the fractal nature of Elliott waves, the three waves might well be subcomponents within a larger-level wave 1 working its way higher over a very large span of time.

With that count the present decline is wave 4. The 2nd wave was a directional Zig-Zag, and so wave 4 is more likely to be a sideways Flat.

A 50% correction would be reasonable in such a case,  the price decline has already exceeded that retracement, and so the decline may well  be at or near its end.

That's a lot of assumptions, and so the likelihood that it is correct is fairly low. On the other hand, it is far from being beyond the realm of probability. Time, as always, will tell.

I've marked the current dollars adjusted for inflation, called "2008 dollars", on the 20-year chart. It shows that the decline only today broke below the 2011 low of $74.95 in current dollars, or $71.74 in 2008 dollars.

In other words, take inflation out of the equation, and the "crash" has only now begun and hasn't travelled far enough yet to amount to more than a gentle nudge, barely visible on the chart.

As a trader I live in the short term as I construct my positions and assess the odds and risk/reward ratios. My ideal position has a lifespan of no more than three weeks. I trade in Braudel's histoire Ã©vénementielle.

But in assessing trends, I look at the conjoncture, and if the data is available, at the longue durée. Traders who ignore the broader sweeps of history are likely to misunderstand the present, which leads to bad trades.

(See the companion essay "Crude Oil and the Black Swan", posted Jan. 3.)

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 2, 2015

References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. My longer-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here.


Elliott wave analysis tracks patterns in price movements. The principal practitioner of Elliott wave analysis is Robert Prechter at Elliott Wave International. His book, Elliott Wave Principle, is a must-read for people interested in this form of analysis, as is his most recent publication, Visual Guide to Elliott Wave Trading. 

Several web sites summarize Elliott wave theory, among them, Investopedia, StockCharts and Wikipedia.


Alerts


Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.

Image licensing: Crude oil price history from 1861-2006, dollars per barrel



Created by Michael Ströck, 2006. Released under the GFDL.
Date30 March 2006 (original upload date)
SourceOriginally from en.wikipedia; description page is/was here.
AuthorOriginal uploader was Mstroeck at en.wikipedia
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Licensed under the GFDL by the author; Released under the GNU Free Documentation License.

Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.





Friday's Finalists

Of the two symbols, both bear signals, that made it past the early rounds of analysis (see "Friday's Prospects"), SNI failed confirmation, moving back within its 20-day price channel.

The finalist, RICE, confirmed the signal by trading lower. However, it runs afoul of my preference for bid/ask spreads on options of under 10%. RICE comes in at 13%.

I won't be opening any new positions based on the signals from Wednesday's markets.

Looking forward, Monday's analysis will be based on today's session. I expect low volume today as traders extend their holiday to bridge the gap to the weekend. The next significant trading opportunities will come on Tuesday, Jan. 6.

The next earnings announcements with sufficient liquidity for a very short term volatility play will also provide opportunities on Tuesday. The symbols up for consideration are SD and MON.

The likelihood in brief: Lazy Friday, Carefree Weekend, Lazy Monday, Back-to-Work Tuesday. I'll be glad to see Tuesday come. For someone who enjoys trading as much as I do, the extended break of the winter solstice holidays is a  bit -- well, boring.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 2, 2015

References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. My longer-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here. My volatility trading rules can be read here.



Alerts


Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Friday's Prospects

On Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2014:

Of 1,287 stocks and exchange-traded funds in my analytical universe, six broke beyond their 20-day price channels, two to the upside and four to the downside.

Two symbols survived initial screening, both having broken out to the downside.

No symbols appearing on my supplemental list of innovative companies gave a bull signal.

There are no prospects for trades keyed to earnings under my Volatility Rules.

I shall do further analysis on Friday, Jan. 2, 2015.

The next earnings season begins Jan. 12 with the announcement by AA and runs six weeks. Under the exclusion rule that forbids me from opening new positions in stocks within 30 days of an earnings announcement, increasing numbers of symbols will be removed from my prospective trades list during initial screening.

First-round survivors: Regular rules

The lists are sorted in descending order by average yield. Regular rules means that confirmation will require trading above the 20-day price channel breakout level.


Bull
(none)

Bear
RICE
SNI
Innovators
(bull)
(none)

First-round survivors: Special handling

The lists are sorted in descending order by average yield. Rules for a breakout immediately following an earnings announcement require that confirmation on the following trading day, Reset Day, require that the price be beyond the Reset-Day 20-day price channel. A breakout following a stock going ex-dividend must be confirmed on the fifth trading day after ex-dividend day.

Bull earns
(none)
Bear earns
(none)
Bull ex-div
(none)
Bear ex-div
(none)


Potential trades under my Volatility Rules, keyed to events

The dates are those of the events, all of them earns announcements. Events prior to the opening bell are marked "am", during the trading day "mid", and after the closing bell "pm". The lists are sorted in descending order by average volume.

Friday pm
(none)
Monday am
(none)


Methodology

The stocks in my analytical universe all have analyst coverage through the stock-ranking company Zacks Investment Research. Not all of the exchange-traded funds are so covered.

I screen the symbols for historical odds of a profitable signal in the direction of the breakout for the past 12 months.

For symbols whose odds of success are greater than 50%, I next screen for the absence of an earnings announcement within the next 30 days.

For bear signals, I also screen to ensure the ability to do a trade because of the presence of options, without yet passing judgment on whether those options are liquid enough to support a trade.

I sort by the results in descending order by the average yield on signals in the direction of the breakout in preparation for the second round of analysis after the opening bell.

-- Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, Jan. 1, 2015

References

My shorter-term trading rules can be read here. And the classic Turtle Trading rules on which my rules are based can be read here.

Elliott wave analysis tracks patterns in price movements. The principal practitioner of Elliott wave analysis is Robert Prechter at Elliott Wave International. His book, Elliott Wave Principle, is a must-read for people interested in this form of analysis, as is his most recent publication, Visual Guide to Elliott Wave Trading. 

Several web sites summarize Elliott wave theory, among them, Investopedia, StockCharts and Wikipedia.

Alerts

Two social media feeds provide notification whenever something new is posted.
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decision decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.
License

Creative Commons License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.Tss s ss